Thanks for logging in.
MetaxuCafe UpdatesSearching Member Sites
I’ve recently added a search function so that you can limit your Google search to just the blogs that are members of MetaxuCafe. I think that will be a good resource for everyone looking for literary topics online and you’ll find it right on the front page as well as other places on the site. Now if you want to read about, say Orhan Pamuk, but only want to search the litblogs you trust, you can narrow your search right here.
Dead Beat, as you know, has that old streak of engineering in him, and so has for years wondered how e-books or e-magazines or e-papers should work. About eight years ago he decided that it would require a flexible screen. Imagine the cover of a magazine - two sheets/four pages. Each page would be an individual screen which could download a single page of the book/mag/paper. In this way the reader could still turn pages, have the flexibility of paper, in other words the emotional expreience. Then he wondered would a single flexible sheet do: one leaf/two pages. Then he wondered would one page do AS LONG AS IT WAS FLEXIBLE.
So what’s with the flexible?
Well, he knows reading a newspaer off a screen while you are sitting at a desk is not a relaxing experience always. Nor is it necessary relaxing to read it from a laptop. Hence the flexibility. Well, like all Dead Beat’s great inventions (e.g. French Fry vending machine) someone else got up off their ar#e and created it.
But now let us add this into the frey:
Amazon.com , the world’s largest Web retailer, said Monday it will begin selling an electronic book reader with wireless access, the latest attempt to build consumer interest in portable reading devices.
Wireless access, based on the cellphone broadband technology EVDO, is built into the 10-ounce, thin white device. Downloading content does not require a computer and takes less than a minute for a full-length book. The $399 electronic book device will allow downloads of more than 90,000 book titles, blogs, magazines and newspapers.
“The question is, can you improve upon something as highly evolved and well-suited to its task as the book? And if so, how?,” Amazon.com Chief Executive Jeff Bezos said at a press conference in New York.
There it is. That’s Dead Beat’s point, thank you J.B.
The question is, can you improve upon something as highly evolved and well-suited to its task as the book?
This post has been viewed (on this page) 568 times .
Besides the possible environmental benefits of an ebook, I do not see it really appealing to me. I remember being in college the week my thesis was due (on Joyce’s “Ulysses"), and having about ten books piled on either side of me as I drank coffee and feverishly wrote. Sure, it was a pain to drag all those weighty tomes about (and flirt with girls at the same time), but wasn’t the task entrusted to me - to get at the heart of this text - weighty too? I liked the deep blue binding of my copy of Ulysses - which was an important part of Joyce’s first edition, because the white of the title text was supposed to rise out of the blue cloth like Greece out of the waves. Paper - its hues and feel and heaviness - these things are all part of the experience for me. I fear the “lightness” of ebooks. I want the heavy books lining my walls like a fortress, like a house of words or a Borgesian labyrinth.
Besides, are we really so lazy to go to the corner bookstore? I hope not.
– D. Heikkinen (11/29 at 29-Nov 02:07 -05:00)
Page 1 of 1 pages of comments
The upside of ebook readers is, they save us trips to the bookstore & library. The downside of ebook readers is, they save us trips to the bookstore & library.
But they really need to do this:
You know how there are at least three ways to do anything on a PC? Like, you can click on icons to copy & paste, or get the drop-down from “edit”, or right click…
Well, an ebook reader should be designed so you can either open it up like a real book, with two pages showing, and you can hold it like a real book, OR you can fold it back flat onto itself and make each page appear, one at a time on one side. Different people are comfortable holding books different ways.
Maybe they already do this, I don’t know.
– Bill Ectric (11/20 at 20-Nov 09:29 -05:00)